Understanding Mac Mic Group and Mac Mic Strategic Land: What Local Residents Should Know
·
May 1, 2024
As our local community faces the prospect of a major new housing development, it is crucial that residents understand the key players behind the project. One of the main entities involved is Mac Mic Strategic Land, a division of the Mac Mic Group. But who are they, and what do they do? This article provides a background on the company, its objectives, and what it could mean for our community.
Who is Mac Mic Group?
Mac Mic Group, formerly known as Mactaggart & Mickel, is a long-established, family-owned property company with roots dating back to 1925. Originally a Scottish housebuilding firm, the company has since evolved into a diversified real estate group with interests in housebuilding, land promotion, private rental properties, and investments.
Key Facts About Mac Mic Group
Founded: 1925, as Mactaggart & Mickel
Business Areas: Housebuilding, land promotion, rentals, and investments
Geographical Focus: Primarily Scotland and England
Reputation: Well-established in property development but with a growing emphasis on land acquisition and promotion
While the company was once best known for constructing homes under its own brand, it has more recently pivoted towards strategic land promotion—helping landowners secure planning permission for large-scale developments and then selling the land to housebuilders.
In 2022, the company sold its housebuilding division to Springfield Properties, allowing it to concentrate on land promotion and property investment. This shift highlights the company’s increasing role in unlocking land for development rather than building homes themselves.
What is Mac Mic Strategic Land?
Mac Mic Strategic Land is a division of Mac Mic Group that specializes in strategic land promotion. This means they identify and acquire land, navigate the planning system, and seek to secure planning permission for large-scale residential and mixed-use developments.
What Does Mac Mic Strategic Land Do?
Identifies Land with Development Potential
Targets greenfield and agricultural land near existing settlements.
Works with landowners to assess long-term development possibilities.
Navigates the Planning System
Prepares planning applications and masterplans for large-scale developments.
Engages with local authorities and planning committees to influence decisions.
Often promotes land through Local Plans and Strategic Development Plans.
Sells Land to Housebuilders
Once planning permission is obtained, land is sold to housebuilders for actual development.
Mac Mic Group itself no longer builds homes; instead, they facilitate the process for major developers.
Engages in Community Consultation
Often presents plans as "sustainable" and "community-focused" to gain public support.
Conducts public exhibitions and consultation events—though outcomes often favor developers.
Current Scope of Mac Mic Strategic Land
They are involved in over 4,000 acres of land promotion across the UK.
They claim a 90% success rate in obtaining planning permissions.
They emphasize sustainability, green infrastructure, and community wellbeing in their promotional materials.
What This Means for Local Communities
While Mac Mic Strategic Land presents its developments as beneficial for local communities, there are significant concerns that residents should be aware of:
Impact on Infrastructure
Large developments place increased pressure on local roads, schools, healthcare, and public services.
Infrastructure upgrades are often promised but not always delivered in full.
Loss of Green Spaces
Many of the sites targeted are greenfield or agricultural land, leading to loss of wildlife habitats and open space.
This can lead to urban sprawl and reduced access to nature.
Risk of Overdevelopment
Many communities are already seeing rapid expansion, with new housing outpacing local services.
Developments promoted by land agents like Mac Mic are often driven by profit rather than genuine local housing needs.
Limited Local Benefits
Although developments may include affordable housing, the proportion is often below what is needed.
Developers sometimes fail to meet their obligations, using viability assessments to reduce commitments.
Public Consultation Challenges
Developers often frame consultations as opportunities for local input, but decisions tend to favor developers over residents.
Objections raised by communities may be overridden by planning inspectors if the government prioritizes housing supply.
What Can Residents Do?
If you are concerned about a Mac Mic Strategic Land development in your area, consider taking the following steps:
Stay Informed – Keep up to date with planning applications and Local Plan reviews.
Engage in the Consultation Process – Attend public meetings and submit formal objections.
Lobby Local Councillors and MPs – Politicians need to be aware of community concerns to advocate for better planning outcomes.
Join Forces with Local Groups – Residents' associations and campaign groups can increase pressure on decision-makers.
Question Sustainability Claims – Demand genuine commitments on infrastructure, green space, and affordable housing.
Conclusion
Mac Mic Group, through its Mac Mic Strategic Land division, is playing a growing role in shaping large-scale housing developments across the UK. While they market their projects as sustainable and beneficial to communities, the reality often involves significant challenges for existing residents—ranging from infrastructure strain to environmental concerns.
As a community, it is essential to stay informed, raise concerns, and actively participate in the planning process. The decisions made today will have long-term implications for our local area, and it is up to residents to ensure that development is carried out in a way that genuinely benefits our community.
James Thornton
Senior Writer
James Thornton is a Surrey-based writer and commentator specialising in housing developments, urban planning, and community impact. With a background in journalism and a keen interest in the evolving landscape of Surrey’s towns and villages, James has spent over a decade researching and reporting on planning policies, local authority decisions, and the balance between development and heritage conservation.